SOC 2 vs HIPAA: What’s Different, What Overlaps & Do You Need Both? 

SOC 2 vs HIPAA is not an either-or decision. SOC 2 can cover much of the security work HIPAA requires, but it does not establish HIPAA compliance. Organizations that need both should reuse shared controls and evidence, then focus their effort on the HIPAA-specific gaps that SOC 2 leaves behind.

SOC 2 vs HIPAA is the wrong framing for most healthcare organizations, because you usually need both.  

SOC 2 proves to customers that your security controls work. HIPAA is the federal law that governs how you protect patient health information. Organizations subject to HIPAA may also need a SOC 2 report when customers or business partners require independent assurance over their security controls. 

Most teams make the same mistake at this point. They run SOC 2 and HIPAA as two separate compliance projects.  

That means two risk assessments, two sets of policies, two evidence folders and twice the cost.  

There’s a better approach. Identify what your SOC 2 program already covers, map those controls to HIPAA, and put your effort into the gaps that are specific to HIPAA. 

This guide shows you how. It covers what each framework requires, where they overlap, how SOC 2 controls map to HIPAA, and what you still need to add. 

What is SOC 2 vs HIPAA: Quick Overview

SOC 2 is a voluntary audit report. HIPAA is a law. 

SOC 2 comes from the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants). An independent CPA firm examines your security controls against five Trust Services Criteria:  

  • Security 
  • Availability  
  • Processing integrity 
  • Confidentiality 
  • Privacy 

Security is the only required criterion. You receive a report you can share with customers.  

A Type I report tests whether your controls are designed well on a single date. A Type II report tests whether they actually worked over a review period, usually 3 to 12 months. 

HIPAA protects protected health information (PHI), meaning any health information linked to an identifiable person. It applies to covered entities (healthcare providers, health plans and clearinghouses) and to their business associates (BA).  

A business associate is any vendor that creates, receives, stores or sends PHI on a covered entity’s behalf. SaaS platforms, cloud hosts, billing services and AI tools that process patient data all qualify, and each carries direct legal liability.  

The HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) enforces HIPAA. No official HIPAA certification exists. 

The two frameworks have different legal status, but they share far more of the actual work than that suggests. You can see this as soon as you compare what each one asks you to do. 

SOC 2 vs HIPAA Compliance Requirements: What Does Each Require?

SOC 2 requires you to design controls and have an auditor test them. HIPAA compliance requires specific safeguards, contracts and procedures whether or not anyone audits you. Much of the work underneath is the same. 

SOC 2 

HIPAA 

Legal status 

Voluntary 

Mandatory federal law 
Who sets it 
AICPA
HHS, enforced by OCR
Who needs it 
Service organizations whose customers ask for it
Covered entities and business associates handling PHI 
Data covered 
Whatever your defined system handles
PHI; the Security Rule covers electronic PHI (ePHI)
How you prove it 
A CPA firm issues a Type I or Type II report
Documented risk analysis, safeguards, policies and records
Flexibility 
You design controls to meet the criteria
Some safeguards are required; others are “addressable”
Breach notification 
No mandated timeline
Fixed deadlines for notifying partners, patients and regulators
Consequence of falling short 
Lost deals and longer security reviews
Civil penalties, corrective action plans, possible criminal charges
How long it lasts 
The industry standard is twelve months. No obligations are mentioned.
Ongoing obligation; documentation kept for six years

“Addressable” does not mean optional. You either implement the safeguard or document why an alternative gives equal protection. 

SOC 2 Requirements: From Scope to Type II Report

1. Define your system scope: Describe the services, infrastructure, software, people, data and procedures under review, following the AICPA’s description criteria (DC 200). Decide how to treat subservice organizations such as your cloud host: “carve-out” leaves them out of your report, while “inclusive” brings their controls into it. 

2. Choose the Trust Services Criteria: Security, covered by the common criteria CC1 to CC9, is mandatory. Add Availability (A1), Processing Integrity (PI1), Confidentiality (C1) or Privacy (P1 to P8) based on what you promise customers. 

3. Design controls for each criterion: The common trust service criteria cover:  

4. Collect evidence that the controls operate: Keep records such as access reviews, change tickets, training logs and incident reports. CC4 requires you to monitor that your controls keep working, not just that they exist. 

5 .Go through a CPA examination: An independent CPA firm examines your controls under AICPA attestation standards. For Type I, it checks design on a single date. For SOC 2 Type II, it tests samples of evidence across a review period, usually 3 to 12 months. 

6. Receive and share your report: The report contains the auditor’s opinion, your management assertion, your system description and, for Type II, the tests performed and any exceptions. Customers usually receive it under the NDA. 

HIPAA Requirements for Healthcare SaaS Companies

1. Determine whether HIPAA applies. Use the definitions in 45 CFR 160.103 to confirm whether you are a covered entity, a business associate or neither. 

2. Identify every system that stores or sends ePHI. The current Security Rule does not require a formal asset inventory, but you can’t complete step 3 without one. The proposed Security Rule update would make an inventory mandatory.

3. Conduct risk analysis. Section 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) requires an accurate, thorough assessment of risks to the confidentiality, integrity and availability of ePHI. Section 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B) then requires you to reduce those risks to a reasonable level. 

4. Implement the three safeguard categories.

5. Sign BAAs. Sections 164.308(b), 164.314(a) and 164.504(e) require written business associate agreements with covered entities and with any subcontractor that handles PHI for you.

6. Set up Privacy Rule processes. As a business associate, you may use and disclose PHI only as your BAA allows (164.502(a)(3)). You must also limit PHI to the minimum necessary for each task (164.502(b)). 

8. Keep ongoing documentation. Section 164.316 requires written policies and records of required actions. You must keep them for six years and review them as your environment changes. 

Put the two lists side by side, and the duplication stands out. Both need a defined scope, risk assessment, security controls, and evidence. Running them as separate projects means doing those steps twice. 

The one difference that matters most is scope. SOC 2 lets you choose what the audit covers, while HIPAA follows the PHI wherever it goes. A single program works only if your SOC 2 scope includes the systems that hold patient data. 

Stuck on the crosswalk? Let’s see exactly which SOC 2 controls you already have, and which HIPAA requirements still need your attention. 

Book a slot with us: 

What Are the Differences and Overlaps Between HIPAA and SOC 2?

SOC 2 and HIPAA overlap in access control, risk management, monitoring, incident response, encryption and change management. They differ in purpose and legal status. HIPAA is a federal law governing healthcare information, with requirements for BAAs, rules on using and disclosing PHI, and breach notification.  

SOC 2 is an independent attestation of your controls against the AICPA’s Trust Services Criteria. A SOC 2 program supports many HIPAA security requirements, but it does not replace HIPAA compliance. 

Where HIPAA and SOC 2 Overlap

Both frameworks expect you to limit access to sensitive data, encrypt it, log activity, respond to incidents, assess risk regularly, vet vendors and train staff. That shared ground is where your existing SOC 2 work pays off twice.

Key Differences Between SOC 2 and HIPAA

  • Purpose: SOC 2 builds customer trust. HIPAA protects patients’ rights and data under law. 
  • Data scope: SOC 2 covers any data you choose. HIPAA covers PHI, wherever it lives. 
  • Obligations beyond security: HIPAA adds contracts (BAAs), privacy rules and breach deadlines. SOC 2 has no direct equivalent for any of these. 
  • Proof: SOC 2 gives you a report. HIPAA gives you a legal duty you must be able to show you meet.

The overlaps are what you reuse. The differences are what you add. A control mapping shows you exactly where the line falls between the two. 

SOC 2 HIPAA Mapping: How Do SOC 2 Controls Map to HIPAA Requirements?

Most SOC 2 common criteria map to a HIPAA Security Rule standard. The mapping stops where HIPAA adds healthcare-specific obligations

SOC 2 area 

HIPAA requirement 
Where they overlap 
What HIPAA still requires 

CC3.1–CC3.4 Risk Assessment 

164.308(a)(1)(ii) 

(A) Risk analysis (R); (B) Risk management (R) 

Both require a documented, repeatable risk assessment 

An enterprise-wide risk analysis scoped to every system that creates, receives, maintains or transmits ePHI. It must include an ePHI data-flow inventory and a risk management plan that shows how each identified risk is being reduced. 

CC6.1–CC6.3 Logical access; CC6.4 Physical access 

164.312(a)(1) Access control; 164.312(d) Authentication; 164.308(a)(4) Information access management; 164.310(a)–(d) Physical safeguards 

Role-based access, provisioning and deprovisioning, user verification, facility controls 

Unique user IDs (R), a documented emergency access procedure (R), automatic logoff (A), and device and media disposal and re-use controls (164.310(d)). Role-based access must also align with the Privacy Rule’s minimum necessary standard (164.502(b)). 

CC7.2–CC7.5 System Operations 

164.308(a)(6) Security incident procedures (R) 

164.312(b) Audit controls (R) 

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information system activity review (R) 

Logging, anomaly detection, incident response and recovery 

Scheduled review of ePHI access logs, not only alerting. Every incident also needs a four-factor breach risk assessment under 164.402, and notification to affected individuals within 60 days of discovery under 164.404. 

CC8.1 Change Management 

164.308(a)(8) Evaluation (R); 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B) Risk management 

Authorized, tested and approved system changes 

A periodic technical and non-technical evaluation of the whole Security Rule program. A change that affects ePHI flows or storage should trigger a risk analysis update. 

CC9.2 Vendor Management 

164.308(b)(1), 164.314(a) and 164.504(e) Business associate contracts

Vendor due diligence and ongoing third-party risk reviews 

A signed BAA with every vendor that touches ePHI. It must include the required contract terms, flow-down BAAs with subcontractors (164.502(e)(1)(ii)), and breach reporting from the business associate to the covered entity (164.410). 

CC1.4 / CC2.2 Competence and Communication 

164.308(a)(5) Security awareness and training; 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(C) Sanction policy (R) 

Onboarding and recurring security training 

Training that covers security reminders, malware protection, log-in monitoring and password management (all A).  

It must also be tied to your own HIPAA policies and backed by a written, enforced sanctions policy. 

A1.2–A1.3 Availability 

164.308(a)(7) Contingency plan 

Backups, disaster recovery and recovery testing 

A data backup plan (R), a disaster recovery plan (R) and an emergency mode operation plan (R), plus contingency testing (A) and an applications and data criticality analysis (A) that ranks which ePHI systems get restored first. 

CC6.1 / CC6.7 / C1.1 Encryption and Confidentiality 

164.312(a)(2)(iv) Encryption and decryption (A); 164.312(e)(1) Transmission security 

Encryption at rest and in transit 

For each ePHI system, a documented decision (164.306(d)(3)): either encrypt, or record why encryption is not reasonable and appropriate and what equivalent control is in place. Data encrypted to HHS guidance also qualifies for breach safe harbor. 

Notes:  

(R) Required: HIPAA says you must do this. (A) Addressable: you must either do this, do something equally effective, or write down why it doesn’t apply to you. It is not optional.  

CC, A1 and C1 are SOC 2 criteria codes. CC covers security, A1 covers availability, and C1 covers confidentiality. 

The “where they overlap” column lists controls that SOC 2 and HIPAA share, so you build each one once and reuse the same evidence for both frameworks. The “what HIPAA still requires” column lists what SOC 2 doesn’t cover, and that’s where your HIPAA work should go. 

One caution from our audit: a SOC 2 control only counts toward HIPAA if it covers the systems that hold ePHI. We’ve seen well-run access reviews that proved nothing for HIPAA because they covered the wrong systems. Before you count any control toward HIPAA, check that the systems in your SOC 2 report match the systems that store or process ePHI. 

Already Have SOC 2? What Do You Still Need for HIPAA?

If you already have a SOC 2, you don’t need to start over. You need the HIPAA-specific pieces SOC 2 never produces, an ePHI risk analysis, BAAs, breach procedures, Privacy Rule processes and HIPAA documentation. 

In one recent SOC 2 engagement, the two most significant gaps we found were an information classification policy that didn’t govern how sensitive data was communicated, and breach detection that relied on manual review with no SIEM. Both passed as “reasonable” in early SOC 2 readiness discussions. Under HIPAA, both would be serious exposures, because you can’t meet a notification deadline for a breach you can’t reliably detect. 

SOC 2 to HIPAA Gap Checklist

Most items on this list extend something your SOC 2 program already has. Only BAAs and Privacy Rule processes start from zero.  

If you’re building both frameworks from scratch, the same approach applies. You just set it up that way from day one. 

How to Become HIPAA and SOC 2 Compliant Without Duplicating the Work

To become HIPAA and SOC 2 compliant, run SOC 2 and HIPAA as one program. Scope it around your PHI, build shared controls once, and put separate effort into the HIPAA-specific gaps only. Follow this order: 

At KLEAP, we take a manual-first approach to compliance readiness. What we do is make sure you walk into that audit ready. We run manual gap assessments against SOC 2 and the HIPAA Security Rule, help implement controls and draft policies, conduct pre-certification internal audits, and help close any gaps we find. 

Because we’re also a penetration testing firm, the controls we help you build get tested the way an attacker would test them. That covers your web and mobile apps, APIs, cloud, and the LLM and AI systems that increasingly touch patient data. 

Talk to Your Concierge about a combined SOC 2 and HIPAA readiness assessment. 

Frequently Asked Question

HIPAA and SOC 2 overlap in areas such as access control, risk management, security monitoring, incident response, encryption, and vendor risk management. The main difference is that HIPAA is a federal law governing the protection and permitted use of protected health information (PHI), while SOC 2 is an independent attestation against the AICPA Trust Services Criteria. SOC 2 controls can support HIPAA compliance, but a SOC 2 report does not establish HIPAA compliance. 

No. SOC 2 can cover controls that also support HIPAA requirements, but a SOC 2 report does not establish HIPAA compliance. SOC 2 may provide evidence for areas such as access control, risk management, monitoring and incident response. HIPAA adds requirements including PHI-specific risk analysis, BAAs, Privacy Rule processes, breach procedures and documentation. 

Manage SOC 2 and HIPAA through one control program rather than two separate compliance projects. Map the overlapping requirements, implement shared controls once, collect evidence once, and separately address HIPAA-specific requirements such as BAAs and applicable Privacy and Breach Notification Rule obligations. This reduces duplicated compliance work without assuming that a SOC 2 control automatically satisfies HIPAA. 

It depends on what the startup does and the data it handles. HIPAA applies when the startup qualifies as a covered entity or business associate; simply being a digital health company does not automatically make it subject to HIPAA. SOC 2 is separate and may be pursued to provide customers with independent assurance over security controls. A digital health startup that is subject to HIPAA and also needs SOC 2 assurance for customers may therefore need to address both. 

Start with a HIPAA-specific gap assessment rather than rebuilding your security program. Determine whether HIPAA applies, map where ePHI is created, received, maintained or transmitted, conduct the required HIPAA risk analysis, and map your existing SOC 2 controls against the applicable HIPAA requirements. HHS specifically expects risk analysis to consider the systems and applications that access or house ePHI. From there, identify what your SOC 2 program does not address, such as required BAAs and other HIPAA-specific processes and documentation. 

Share

Table of Contents