Complete Application Security Coverage. Hassle Free.
Our concierge model helps you uncover real exploit paths, fix what matters, and secure your application stack while complying with evolving regulatory standards.
Complete Application Security Coverage. Hassle Free.
Security Issues Others Miss and Attackers Exploit
Application Security Risks in Healthcare
ePHI
Exposure
Broken access control, insecure record lookup, weak sessions.
Integration
Leakage
EHR, billing, scheduling, labs, third-party tools.
Cross-user
Access
IDOR/BOLA object authorization failures.
Account
Takeover Paths
Weak authorization protocols, inconsistent MFA, unsafe resets.
Risks in Manufacturing
Operational data exposure Orders, pricing, BOMs, inventory, shipments, partner docs.
Role boundary
failures
Vendor, plant admin, distributor, customer access overlap.
Integration
exploit paths
ERP/MES/WMS/TMS APIs to web apps.
Mobile/device
risk
Shared devices, weak expiry, cached tokens, insecure storage.
Application Security Risks in Healthcare
ePHI exposure
Integration leakage
Cross-user access
Account takeover paths
Risks in Manufacturing
Operational data exposure
Role boundary failures
Integration exploit paths
Mobile/device risk
360° Application Security & Testing
Risks: Broken authentication, access control flaws, insecure sessions, injection paths, unsafe file handling, and sensitive data exposure.
Risks: Insecure local storage, weak token handling, insecure communication, client-side trust issues, and API misuse through the app.
Risks: BOLA/IDOR, broken auth, token flaws, excessive data exposure, missing rate limits, unsafe input validation, and inconsistent authorization across endpoints.
Risks: Business logic flaws, unsafe data handling, missing validation, workflow-level flaws, and unsafe dependencies that create recurring bugs.
Web Application Security Testing
Risks: Broken authentication, access control flaws, insecure sessions, injection paths, unsafe file handling, and sensitive data exposure.
Mobile Application Security Testing
Risks: Insecure local storage, weak token handling, insecure communication, client-side trust issues, and API misuse through the app.
API Security Testing
Risks: BOLA/IDOR, broken auth, token flaws, excessive data exposure, missing rate limits, unsafe input validation, and inconsistent authorization across endpoints.
Source Code Review
Risks: Business logic flaws, unsafe data handling, missing validation, workflow-level flaws, and unsafe dependencies that create recurring bugs.
How KLEAP Does It?
Gap Assessment
Objectives & Clear Checkpoints
Audit-Ready Report
Fix-Ready Remediation Plan
Retest Guidance & KT
Attack Surface Inventory
How KLEAP Does It?
Audit-ready report
Fix-ready remediation plan
Retest guidance & KT
Attack surface inventory
KLEAP Ensures Security Testing Doesn’t Disrupt Your Release Schedule.
Application security vs. software security: What’s the difference ?
Application security focuses on protecting a specific application’s attack surface: web apps, mobile apps, APIs, authentication, authorization, data handling, and business logic. Software security is broader and includes secure design, secure coding, dependency risk, SDLC controls, and how software is built, tested, and maintained. KLEAP covers both angles through web application security testing, API security testing, mobile application penetration testing, and source code review to reduce real exploit paths.
How do you scope a web application penetration test ?
KLEAP scopes web application penetration testing by defining what matters most first: in-scope apps, environments (staging or production), user roles, key workflows, and sensitive data paths. We also confirm exclusions, testing windows, and guardrails. Final scope typically includes domains/subdomains, authenticated areas, admin panels, integrations, and critical workflows like onboarding, payments, records access, or approvals, so testing reflects real business risk.
What should we provide before an API security test (docs, Postman, auth) ?
What’s the difference between SAST, DAST, and manual penetration testing ?
SAST (Static Application Security Testing) scans source code for insecure patterns before deployment. DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing) tests a running app from the outside to find exploitable behavior. Manual penetration testing validates real attack paths across web, mobile, and APIs, including business logic flaws, authorization bypass, and chained exploits that automated tools often miss. KLEAP uses manual validation to reduce false positives and deliver fix-ready findings.
How do you test modern auth flows like SSO, OAuth, and token-based APIs ?
We test modern authentication by evaluating both the login flow and the abuse paths around it. For SSO, we validate session handling, role mapping, and access control consistency across apps and APIs. For OAuth/token-based APIs, we test token issuance, expiry, refresh flows, scope enforcement, and authorization checks at the object level. The goal is to confirm that a valid token cannot be used to access the wrong tenant, role, or resource.
Can you test mobile apps for insecure local storage and token leakage ?
Yes. Mobile application security testing covers insecure local storage, token leakage, weak session handling, insecure network communication, and backend API misuse through the app. We look for sensitive data stored in plaintext, tokens cached improperly, and exposure through logs or debugging artifacts. Findings are delivered with clear reproduction steps and remediation guidance your developers can apply quickly.